Return to Index

July 17-18, 2003 : Pulled another nearly an all-nighter

Let's see. Let's get the excuses out of the way.

The sky was clear though wispy clouds developed late. The Moon rose a little after 11 and the sky was pretty bright. I put the C5 on Ray's Brackets somewhat forward but maybe not enough to balance the Celestron 6.3 reducer/corrector, flip mirror, 25mm silvertop plossl, 9x50 RA finder plus the Starlight Xpress MX916 camera. While GOTO was great again finding everything on the chip, the mount didn't track as well as it did the last time out. I am not sure how evident it is in these processed images, but on individual frames, the faintest stars show an almost packman shape to them (circle with a piece missing) which suggests a funny sort of wobble, even at only 60 seconds. Stacked frames can show faint stars with a hole in the middle.

The other problem was seeing. When Mars rose it had these gorgeous diffraction spikes coming off it which I guess indicates a "thick" atmosphere, for lack of a better term. Arcturus twinkled madly. So despite my doing my best to get good focus, the vast majority of my images were soft. I tried to isolate the very best for stacking, but that didn't leave too many. My stars are fat and the images are soft and overall, I'm not very pleased.

I need to address the balance issue right away. I need to learn to judge seeing though I'm surprised the extent to which it hurt me at F6.3 (ish -- with the flip mirror it is North of this, but how much I do not know.) And as always, I need to take more images regardless of the exposure but I have a problem doing that since I'm still into quantity over quality. I need to get a bee in my bonet over a particular object before I'm likely to follow through. Or maybe I just have to take enough mediocre images to get disgusted with myself or perhaps stop meeting with the approval of my NexStar buddies so that I stop being lazy and start being more serious. ;-) You guys are too easy on me!!!

I took some nebula images - M16 The Eagle, and M whatever the Crescent is, but I didn't like them at all so I didn't bother. As it is, M27 is soft and does not show much depth.

1
  thm_M11_3x60sSUM_DS.jpg  
 
M11_3x60sSUM_DS.JPG
537 x 463 pixels
2
  thm_M13_2x90plus1x60SUM_DS.jpg  
 
M13_2x90plus1x60SUM_DS.JPG
573 x 484 pixels
3
  thm_M26_6x60sSUM_DS.jpg  
 
M26_6x60sSUM_DS.JPG
647 x 533 pixels
4
  thm_M27_8x60sSUM_DS.jpg  
 
M27_8x60sSUM_DS.JPG
543 x 455 pixels
5
  thm_M3_5x60sSUM_DS.jpg  
 
M3_5x60sSUM_DS.JPG
583 x 487 pixels
6
  thm_M92_3x90sSUM_DSscaled120s.jpg  
 
M92_3x90sSUM_DSscaled120s.JPG
584 x 500 pixels


Return to Index